comparison of the sensory-motor block effects of low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine and lidocaine in anorectal surgery with spinal anesthesia

Authors

مهدی قائمی

m ghaemi مجید انصاری

m ansari سعید محمدی

s mohammadi

abstract

background & objective: outpatient surgery can be performed by general or spinal anesthesia. spinal anesthetic drugs have side effects. many anesthesiologists choose general anesthesia, because of its relative predictability and to avoid undesirable side effects associated with spinal anesthesia. for example lidocaine is frequently associated with transient neuroligic symptoms (tns). bupivacaine may cause urinary retention, prolonged discharge time and unpredictable level of anesthesia dependent on dose. reducing bupivacaine dose will shorten the duration of action and its anesthesia level will be predictable in saddle block technique. this study was designed to assess the effects of hyperbaric, low dose bupivacaine in level of sensory block, duration of anesthesia and selective sensory block in an rectal surgery and its comparison with lidocaine. materials & methods: in a clinical trial study, 64 patients who were the candidates for anorectal surgery were divided in two groups randomly. in one group, hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% was injected in sitting position. the other group received hyperbaric lidocaine 5% in the same position. the patients were laid in lithotomy position after 5 minute. blood pressure, pulse rate, severity of sensory & motor block, duration of anesthesia and tonicity of anal sphincter were recorded in two groups. the results were analyzed through t-test, chi square and variance analysis. results: sensory level and anesthesia duration in bupivacaine group were higher than lidocaine group. motor block degree and anal sphincter tonicity loss in lidocaine group were greater than the other one. blood pressure decreasing in lidocaine group was significantly higher to bupivacaine group. conclusion: the proper sensory level and short anesthetic duration of low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine are comparable with lidocaine in saddle block position, and selective sensory block may be useful for anorectal surgery in lithotomy position.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

مقایسه‌ی اثر بلوک حس‍ی- حرکت‍ی بوپیواکائین با لیدوکائین دوز پایین و هیپرباریک در جراح‍ی آنورکتال به روش بی‌حس‍ی نخاع‍ی

Background & Objective: Outpatient surgery can be performed by general or spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthetic drugs have side effects. Many anesthesiologists choose general anesthesia, because of its relative predictability and to avoid undesirable side effects associated with spinal anesthesia. For example lidocaine is frequently associated with Transient Neuroligic Symptoms (TNS). Bupivacain...

full text

[Unilateral spinal anesthesia with low 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine dose.].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Unilateral spinal anesthesia may be advantageous, especially for outpatient procedures. Low anesthetic doses, pencil point or cutting point needles, slow injection rate and the lateral position have been reported as helping unilateral spinal anesthesia technique. This longitudinal study aimed at investigating the depth of unilateral spinal anesthesia with 5 mg of 0.5% ...

full text

The Analgesic Efficacy of Low Dose Dexamethasone Added to Bupivacaine in Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerves Block in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia

Background & Objective: Dexamethasone has been emerged as an adjuvant to local anesthetics to provide optimal analgesia. We have evaluated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of adding a low dose dexamethasone to bupivacaine in ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blocks in patients undergoing inguinal herniorraphy under spinal anesthesia. Materials & Methods: 50 patients in the range of 20 - 80 ...

full text

comparison of the effects of pre-anesthetic administration of normal saline, ringer and voluven on the spread of sensory block with hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

background spinal anesthesia is an important and commonly used method for surgical anesthetic in operating rooms. however, even with identical drug dosage and administration mode, the extent of drug distribution in vivo is highly variable and difficult to control. preanesthetic administration of fluids immediately before spinal anesthesia (preload) is normal practice. the choice of fluid type m...

full text

New Anesthesia Procedure during Tvt Surgery: Motor Nerve Preservation with Spinal Anesthesia Using Low-dose Bupivacaine

Aims of Study In the case of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) surgery, muscle strength is required for obtaining an adequate increase in abdominal pressure when conducting a stress test by coughing during the procedure. Consequently, although the procedure is frequently performed under local infiltration anesthesia, this requires the use of a large amount of local anesthetic. We employ the use o...

full text

Is Spinal Anesthesia with Low Dose Lidocaine Better than Sevoflorane Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

Background: To evaluate general anesthesia with sevoflurane vs spinal anesthesia with low dose lidocaine 5% onhemodynamics changes in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Methods: In this randomized double blind trial 100 patients (50 patients in each group) older than 60 years underhip surgery were randomized in general anesthesia with sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia with lidocaine 5%.He...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی زنجان

جلد ۱۴، شماره ۵۶، صفحات ۱-۵

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023